Connections Matter: How Interactive Peers Affect Students in Online College Courses


Journal article


Eric Bettinger, Jing Liu, Susanna Loeb
Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, vol. 35, 2016, pp. 932--954


View PDF
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Bettinger, E., Liu, J., & Loeb, S. (2016). Connections Matter: How Interactive Peers Affect Students in Online College Courses. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 35, 932–954. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21932


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Bettinger, Eric, Jing Liu, and Susanna Loeb. “Connections Matter: How Interactive Peers Affect Students in Online College Courses.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 35 (2016): 932–954.


MLA   Click to copy
Bettinger, Eric, et al. “Connections Matter: How Interactive Peers Affect Students in Online College Courses.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, vol. 35, 2016, pp. 932–54, doi:10.1002/pam.21932.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{bettinger2016a,
  title = {Connections Matter: How Interactive Peers Affect Students in Online College Courses},
  year = {2016},
  journal = {Journal of Policy Analysis and Management},
  pages = {932--954},
  volume = {35},
  doi = {10.1002/pam.21932},
  author = {Bettinger, Eric and Liu, Jing and Loeb, Susanna}
}

Peers affect individual’s productivity in the workforce, in education, and in other team-based tasks. Using large-scale language data from an online college course, we measure the impacts of peer interactions on student learning outcomes and persistence. In our setting, students are quasi-randomly assigned to peers, and as such, we are able to overcome selection biases stemming from endogenous peer grouping. We also mitigate reflection bias by utilizing rich student interaction data. We find that females and older students are more likely to engage in student interactions. Students are also more likely to interact with peers of the same gender and with peers from roughly the same geographic region. For students who are relatively less likely to be engaged in online discussion, exposure to more interactive peers increases their probabilities of passing the course, improves their grade in the course, and increases their likelihood of enrolling in the following academic term. This study demonstrates how the use of large-scale, text-based data can provide insights into students’ learning processes. 


Share



Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in